Recently I had the opportunity to participate in an on-line critique process. I chose this work to have reviewed as I put an awful lot of effort into it and yet, have had it rejected from a few calls. Since the figures are hand embroidered and the background is painted/printed/dyed I did wonder if it was this contrast that created a disconnect for the viewer.
The viewers could only see the work from a distance on their screens but this vantage point brought out interesting points. Although all comments were positive about the figures, there was much critical commentary about the background. It wasn't what I expected. Many didn't understand that the red painted shape was an apple, but even if it is, it was suggested that it is too close to the figures and out of scale.
other comments included:
- The dark spot over their heads was confusing
- they seem to be floating over the background rather than IN the scenery
- the little strip of blue sky at the top maybe unnecessary
Since I worked on the figures for so long I am willing to cut them out and re-create a new background for them. That is definitely on my 'to-do' list.
However I wondered if you would be interested in weighing in on this critique, not to mention critiques in general. I had thought that I was lucky to have been chosen by SAQA for this opportunity. But some people have let me know that I was very brave to do this and they wouldn't be able to expose their work to strangers in this way. What do you think? Critique: helpful or hurtful?